Export limit exceeded: 352249 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (122 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-3009 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 8.1 High |
| A security flaw in the IdentityBrokerService.performLogin endpoint of Keycloak allows authentication to proceed using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator. An attacker who knows the IdP alias can reuse a previously generated login request to bypass the administrative restriction. This undermines access control enforcement and may allow unauthorized authentication through a disabled external provider. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3047 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 7 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.2, Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.2.14, Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4 and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in org.keycloak.broker.saml. When a disabled Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) client is configured as an Identity Provider (IdP)-initiated broker landing target, it can still complete the login process and establish a Single Sign-On (SSO) session. This allows a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to other enabled clients without re-authentication, effectively bypassing security restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1035 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak server during refresh token processing, specifically in the TokenManager class responsible for enforcing refresh token reuse policies. When strict refresh token rotation is enabled, the validation and update of refresh token usage are not performed atomically. This allows concurrent refresh requests to bypass single-use enforcement and issue multiple access tokens from the same refresh token. As a result, Keycloak’s refresh token rotation hardening can be undermined. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2092 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2026-04-16 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. Keycloak's Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) broker endpoint does not properly validate encrypted assertions when the overall SAML response is not signed. An attacker with a valid signed SAML assertion can exploit this by crafting a malicious SAML response. This allows the attacker to inject an encrypted assertion for an arbitrary principal, leading to unauthorized access and potential information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2603 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 2 Keycloak, Build Keycloak | 2026-04-16 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote attacker could bypass security controls by sending a valid SAML response from an external Identity Provider (IdP) to the Keycloak SAML endpoint for IdP-initiated broker logins. This allows the attacker to complete broker logins even when the SAML Identity Provider is disabled, leading to unauthorized authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2575 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 2 Keycloak, Build Keycloak | 2026-04-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger an application level Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a highly compressed SAMLRequest through the SAML Redirect Binding. The server fails to enforce size limits during DEFLATE decompression, leading to an OutOfMemoryError (OOM) and subsequent process termination. This vulnerability allows an attacker to disrupt the availability of the service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3429 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 5 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in the Account REST API of Keycloak that allows a user authenticated at a lower security level to perform sensitive actions intended only for higher-assurance sessions. Specifically, an attacker who has already obtained a victim’s password can delete the victim’s registered MFA/OTP credential without first proving possession of that factor. The attacker can then register their own MFA device, effectively taking full control of the account. This weakness undermines the intended protection provided by multi-factor authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2366 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 2 Keycloak, Build Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authorization bypass vulnerability in the Keycloak Admin API allows any authenticated user, even those without administrative privileges, to enumerate the organization memberships of other users. This information disclosure occurs if the attacker knows the victim's unique identifier (UUID) and the Organizations feature is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3121 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 8 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-clients` permission can exploit a misconfiguration where this permission is equivalent to `manage-permissions`. This allows the administrator to escalate privileges and gain control over roles, users, or other administrative functions within the realm. This privilege escalation can occur when admin permissions are enabled at the realm level. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1180 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in Keycloak’s OpenID Connect Dynamic Client Registration feature when clients authenticate using private_key_jwt. The issue allows a client to specify an arbitrary jwks_uri, which Keycloak then retrieves without validating the destination. This enables attackers to coerce the Keycloak server into making HTTP requests to internal or restricted network resources. As a result, attackers can probe internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, creating an information disclosure and reconnaissance risk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3190 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 3 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. The User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Protection API endpoint for permission tickets fails to enforce the `uma_protection` role check. This allows any authenticated user with a token issued for a resource server client, even without the `uma_protection` role, to enumerate all permission tickets in the system. This vulnerability partial leads to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5967 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. The LDAP testing endpoint allows changing the Connection URL independently without re-entering the currently configured LDAP bind credentials. This flaw allows an attacker with admin access (permission manage-realm) to change the LDAP host URL ("Connection URL") to a machine they control. The Keycloak server will connect to the attacker's host and try to authenticate with the configured credentials, thus leaking them to the attacker. As a consequence, an attacker who has compromised the admin console or compromised a user with sufficient privileges can leak domain credentials and attack the domain. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47072 | 2 Redhat, X-stream | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Ocp Tools and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. This vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to terminate the application with a stack overflow error resulting in a denial of service only by manipulating the processed input stream when XStream is configured to use the BinaryStreamDriver. XStream 1.4.21 has been patched to detect the manipulation in the binary input stream causing the the stack overflow and raises an InputManipulationException instead. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may catch the StackOverflowError in the client code calling XStream if XStream is configured to use the BinaryStreamDriver. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11736 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. Admin users may have to access sensitive server environment variables and system properties through user-configurable URLs. When configuring backchannel logout URLs or admin URLs, admin users can include placeholders like ${env.VARNAME} or ${PROPNAME}. The server replaces these placeholders with the actual values of environment variables or system properties during URL processing. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11734 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability was found in Keycloak that could allow an administrative user with the right to change realm settings to disrupt the service. This action is done by modifying any of the security headers and inserting newlines, which causes the Keycloak server to write to a request that has already been terminated, leading to the failure of said request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3501 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. By setting a verification policy to 'ALL', the trust store certificate verification is skipped, which is unintended. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4540 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak in OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests (PAR). Client-provided parameters were found to be included in plain text in the KC_RESTART cookie returned by the authorization server's HTTP response to a `request_uri` authorization request, possibly leading to an information disclosure vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5685 | 1 Redhat | 12 Apache-camel-spring-boot, Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Keycloak and 9 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in XNIO. The XNIO NotifierState that can cause a Stack Overflow Exception when the chain of notifier states becomes problematically large can lead to uncontrolled resource management and a possible denial of service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-14778 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A significant Broken Access Control vulnerability exists in the UserManagedPermissionService (UMA Protection API). When updating or deleting a UMA policy associated with multiple resources, the authorization check only verifies the caller's ownership against the first resource in the policy's list. This allows a user (Owner A) who owns one resource (RA) to update a shared policy and modify authorization rules for other resources (e.g., RB) in that same policy, even if those other resources are owned by a different user (Owner B). This constitutes a horizontal privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14559 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak. This vulnerability allows the issuance of access and refresh tokens for disabled users, leading to unauthorized use of previously revoked privileges, via a business logic vulnerability in the Token Exchange implementation when a privileged client invokes the token exchange flow. | ||||