Export limit exceeded: 352371 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2576 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-50811 | 1 Tendcode | 1 Izone | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). | ||||
| CVE-2024-50714 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in smarts-srl.com Smart Agent v.1.1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted script to the /FB/getFbVideoSource.php component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10874 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Orbit Fox: Duplicate Page, Menu Icons, SVG Support, Cookie Notice, Custom Fonts & More WordPress plugin before 3.0.2 does not limit URLs which may be used for the stock photo import feature, allowing the user to specify arbitrary URLs. This leads to a server-side request forgery as the user may force the server to access any URL of their choosing. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4789 | 2 Stylemixthemes, Wordpress | 2 Cost Calculator Builder Pro, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| Cost Calculator Builder Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to 3.1.72, via the send_demo_webhook() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2023-31456 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| There is an SSRF vulnerability in the Fluid Topics platform that affects versions prior to 4.3, where the server can be forced to make arbitrary requests to internal and external resources by an authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8678 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| The WP Crontrol plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery in versions 1.17.0 to 1.19.1 via the 'wp_remote_request' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33203 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Nemo | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit UI for Web contains a vulnerability in the chat API endpoint where an attacker may cause a Server-Side Request Forgery. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to information disclosure and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29415 | 2 Fedorindutny, Redhat | 2 Ip, Openshift Devspaces | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The ip package through 2.0.1 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 127.1, 01200034567, 012.1.2.3, 000:0:0000::01, and ::fFFf:127.0.0.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-42282. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9395 | 1 Wangsongyan | 1 Wblog | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in wangsongyan wblog 0.0.1. This affects the function RestorePost of the file backup.go. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49917 | 2 Icegram, Wordpress | 2 Icegram Express, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36458 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The vulnerability allows a malicious low-privileged PAM user to perform server upgrade related actions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36427 | 1 Targit | 1 Decision Suite | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The file-serving function in TARGIT Decision Suite before 24.06.19002 (TARGIT Decision Suite 2024 – June) allows authenticated attackers to read or write to server files via a crafted file request. This can allow code execution via a .xview file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53473 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists n multiple versions of Nimesa Backup and Recovery, If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended requests may be sent to internal servers. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50733 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the Web Services feature of newer Lexmark devices. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50913 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Oxide control plane software before 5 allows SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61768 | 1 Kuno | 1 Kuno Cms | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| KUNO CMS is a fully deployable full-stack blog application. In versions prior to 1.3.15, an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability exists in the Media module of the Kuno CMS administrative panel. A logged-in administrator can upload a specially crafted SVG file containing an external image reference, causing the server to initiate an outgoing connection to an arbitrary external URL. This can lead to information disclosure or internal network probing. Version 1.3.15 contains a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9868 | 1 Sonatype | 1 Nexus Repository Manager | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Remote Browser Plugin in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2.x up to and including 2.15.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exfiltrate proxy repository credentials via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14443 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in ose-openshift-apiserver. This vulnerability allows internal network enumeration, service discovery, limited information disclosure, and potential denial-of-service (DoS) through Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to missing IP address and network-range validation when processing user-supplied image references. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60540 | 1 Karakeep | 1 Karakeep | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| karakeep v0.26.0 to v0.7.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2025-59088 | 1 Redhat | 8 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Rhel Aus and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| If kdcproxy receives a request for a realm which does not have server addresses defined in its configuration, by default, it will query SRV records in the DNS zone matching the requested realm name. This creates a server-side request forgery vulnerability, since an attacker could send a request for a realm matching a DNS zone where they created SRV records pointing to arbitrary ports and hostnames (which may resolve to loopback or internal IP addresses). This vulnerability can be exploited to probe internal network topology and firewall rules, perform port scanning, and exfiltrate data. Deployments where the "use_dns" setting is explicitly set to false are not affected. | ||||