| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in file_upload.php in Synology Photo Station before 6.7.4-3433 and 6.3-2968 allows remote authenticated users to download arbitrary local files via the url parameter. |
| Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Vebto Pixie Image Editor 1.4 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to disclose information or execute arbitrary code via the url parameter to Launderer.php. |
| The UpdraftPlus plugin through 1.13.12 for WordPress has SSRF in the updraft_ajax_handler function in /wp-content/plugins/updraftplus/admin.php via an httpget subaction. NOTE: the vendor reports that this does not cross a privilege boundary |
| The Ping() function in ui/api/target.go in Harbor through 1.3.0-rc4 has SSRF via the endpoint parameter to /api/targets/ping. |
| F5 SSL Intercept iApp 1.5.0 - 1.5.7 and SSL Orchestrator 2.0 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack when deployed using the Dynamic Domain Bypass (DDB) feature feature plus SNAT Auto Map option for egress traffic. |
| MyBB before 1.8.11 allows remote attackers to bypass an SSRF protection mechanism. |
| The external_request api call in App Studio (millicore) allows server side request forgery (SSRF). An attacker could use this flaw to probe the network internal resources, and access restricted endpoints. |
| In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is insufficient redirect validation in the HTTP class, leading to SSRF. |
| In the GetSimple CMS CE 3.3.19 management page, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) can be achieved in the plug-in download address in the backend management system. |
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.4.0. Due to a lack of input validation on URLs in threat intelligence, an attacker with low-level access to the system can trigger Server Side Request Forgery. |
| SparkShop <=1.1.7 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability allows attacks to scan ports on the Intranet or local network where the server resides, attack applications running on the Intranet or local network, or read metadata on the cloud server. |
|
IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 could be vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery Attack (SSRF) attack by constructing URLs from user-controlled data. This could enable attackers to make arbitrary requests to the internal network or to the local file system. IBM X-Force ID: 234180.
|
| An issue was discovered in RWS WorldServer before 11.7.3. An authenticated, remote attacker can perform a ws-legacy/load_dtd?system_id= blind SSRF attack to deploy JSP code to the Apache Axis service running on the localhost interface, leading to command execution. |
| Wildix WMS 6 before 6.02.20221216, WMS 5 before 5.04.20221214, and WMS4 before 4.04.45396.23 allows Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via ZohoClient.php. |
| This vulnerability could allow an attacker to force the server to create and execute a web request granting access to backend APIs that are only accessible to the Mimosa MMP server, or request pages that could perform some actions themselves. The attacker could force the server into accessing routes on those cloud-hosting platforms, accessing secret keys, changing configurations, etc. Affecting MMP: All versions prior to v1.0.3, PTP C-series: Device versions prior to v2.8.6.1, and PTMP C-series and A5x: Device versions prior to v2.5.4.1. |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Gleez Cms 1.2.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via modules/gleez/classes/request.php. |
| Dataprobe iBoot-PDU FW versions prior to 1.42.06162022 contain a vulnerability where a specially crafted PHP script could use parameters from a HTTP request to create a URL capable of changing the host parameter. The changed host parameter in the HTTP could point to another host that will send a request to the host or IP specified in the changed host parameter.
|
| In Zammad 6.4.x before 6.4.2, SSRF can occur. Authenticated admin users can enable webhooks in Zammad, which are triggered as POST requests when certain conditions are met. If a webhook endpoint returned a redirect response, Zammad would follow it automatically with another GET request. This could be abused by an attacker to cause GET requests for example in the local network. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Lithium Forum 2017 Q1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Compose Message Handler. The manipulation of the argument upload_url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A blind site-to-site request forgery vulnerability was found in Satellite server. It is possible to trigger an external interaction to an attacker's server by modifying the Referer header in an HTTP request of specific resources in the server. |
