Export limit exceeded: 12401 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12401 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7522 | 2 Sigmaplugin, Wordpress | 2 Advanced Database Cleaner, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 8.8 High |
| The Advanced Database Cleaner – Premium plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Local File Inclusion in versions up to, and including, 4.1.0 via the 'template' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to include and execute arbitrary .php files on the server, allowing the execution of any PHP code in those files. This can be used to bypass access controls, obtain sensitive data, or achieve code execution in cases where .php file types can be uploaded and included. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6404 | 2 Simonholliday, Wordpress | 2 Anomify Ai – Anomaly Detection And Alerting, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.4 Medium |
| The Anomify AI – Anomaly Detection and Alerting plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'anomify_api_key' parameter in versions up to and including 0.3.6. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and missing output escaping: the plugin applies sanitize_text_field() to the Metric Data Key input before saving it via update_option(), but sanitize_text_field() strips HTML tags without encoding double-quote characters, and the value is then echoed directly into an HTML attribute context (value="...") without esc_attr(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with administrator-level access to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute whenever a user visits the plugin's settings page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8420 | 2 Rdbeach, Wordpress | 2 Blogchat Chat System, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| The BLOGCHAT Chat System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6452 | 2 Ktulhu, Wordpress | 2 Bigfishgames Syndicate, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Bigfishgames Syndicate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bigfishgames_syndicate_submenu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset plugin settings and update them via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8418 | 2 Askywhale, Wordpress | 2 Games Catalog, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Games Catalog plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gc_crud() function which handles the delete action (action=delete) via a GET request without any wp_verify_nonce() / check_admin_referer() call. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary game catalog entries (including the associated WordPress post created for the game) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6072 | 2 Oliverpos, Wordpress | 2 Oliver Pos – A Woocommerce Point Of Sale (pos), Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Oliver POS – A WooCommerce Point of Sale (POS) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to and including 2.4.2.6. The plugin protects its entire /wp-json/pos-bridge/* REST API namespace through the oliver_pos_rest_authentication() permission callback, which uses a loose PHP comparison (==) to compare the attacker-supplied 'OliverAuth' header value against the 'oliver_pos_authorization_token' option. On fresh installations where the admin has not yet completed the connection flow, this option is unset (get_option returns false). Due to PHP's type juggling, the loose comparison '0' == false evaluates to true, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication by sending 'OliverAuth: 0'. This grants full access to all POS API endpoints, enabling attackers to read user data (including administrator details), update user profiles (including email addresses), and delete non-admin users. An admin account email reset can lead to site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6555 | 2 Prosolution, Wordpress | 2 Prosolution Wp Client, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| The ProSolution WP Client plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 2.0.0. This is due to an array validation mismatch where only the first file in the upload array undergoes extension and MIME type validation, while all files are processed and uploaded to a web-accessible directory. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious PHP files and achieve remote code execution by sending a valid first file followed by a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6394 | 2 Wordpress, Wpdive | 2 Wordpress, Nexa Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks, Page Builder For Gutenberg Editor & Fse | 2026-05-20 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Nexa Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks, Page Builder for Gutenberg Editor & FSE plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in versions up to and including 1.1.1. This is due to the import_demo() function accepting a user-supplied URL in the demo_json_file POST parameter and passing it directly to wp_remote_get() without any URL validation or restriction against internal or private network destinations. The nexa_blocks_nonce required for the AJAX action is publicly exposed in the HTML source of any frontend page where the plugin is active via wp_localize_script on the enqueue_block_assets hook, effectively making the nonce available to all visitors and bypassing any intended authentication barrier. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make server-side HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, potentially exposing internal services, cloud metadata endpoints such as the AWS instance metadata service, localhost services, and other resources not intended to be publicly accessible. A secondary SSRF vector also exists whereby image URLs extracted from the attacker-controlled JSON response are subsequently fetched via a second wp_remote_get() call, allowing chained exploitation through a crafted JSON payload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8423 | 2 Javibola, Wordpress | 2 Javibola Custom Theme Test, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The JaviBola Custom Theme Test plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the options page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the site's active theme by modifying the jbct_theme option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8624 | 2 Etspring, Wordpress | 2 Lj Comments Import: Reloaded, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| The LJ comments import: reloaded plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via PHP_SELF Parameter in all versions up to, and including, 0.97.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability arises specifically because PHP_SELF includes attacker-controllable PATH_INFO appended to the script name, and there are two distinct unsanitized echo points for this value in the same function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8610 | 2 Gmo, Wordpress | 2 Typesquare Webfonts For Conoha, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The TypeSquare Webfonts for ConoHa plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to modify the plugin's site-wide font settings, including the typesquare_auth option (fontThemeUseType), show_post_form, and typesquare_fonttheme, by submitting a POST request to any wp-admin page. For fontThemeUseType values 1 and 3, no nonce verification is performed either, meaning those branches are additionally exploitable via cross-site request forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5293 | 2 Olivesystem, Wordpress | 2 診断ジェネレータ作成プラグイン, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 6.4 Medium |
| The 診断ジェネレータ作成プラグイン (Diagnosis Generator) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'js' parameter in versions up to and including 1.4.16. This is due to missing authorization checks and insufficient input sanitization in the themeFunc() function. The function is hooked to 'admin_init' and processes theme update requests without verifying user capabilities, allowing any authenticated user (including subscribers) to save malicious JavaScript to theme files. Additionally, the save() function uses stripslashes() which removes WordPress's magic quotes protection. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in theme files that will execute whenever a user accesses a page containing the diagnosis form shortcode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9010 | 2 Pixelyoursite, Wordpress | 2 Boost, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 7.5 High |
| The Boost plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'current_url' and 'user_name' parameters in versions up to, and including, 2.0.3 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameters and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL queries. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6399 | 2 Wordpress, Yog2515 | 2 Wordpress, General Options | 2026-05-20 | 4.4 Medium |
| The General Options plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to and including 1.1.0. This is due to the use of sanitize_text_field() for output escaping in the Contact Number (ad_contact_number) field — a function that strips HTML tags but does not encode double-quote characters to their HTML entity equivalent ("). When the stored value is echoed inside a double-quoted HTML attribute (value="..."), an attacker-supplied double-quote character breaks out of the attribute context. Even with WordPress's wp_magic_quotes mechanism (which prefixes quotes with a backslash), the resulting \" sequence is NOT treated as an escaped quote by HTML parsers — the backslash is rendered as a literal character and the bare double-quote still closes the attribute. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Administrator-level access and above to inject arbitrary web scripts in the admin settings page that will execute whenever any administrator visits the General Options settings page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8038 | 2 Mcinvale, Wordpress | 2 Faces Of Users, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Faces of Users plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'default' shortcode attribute in the 'facesofusers' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6549 | 2 Goback2, Wordpress | 2 Logo Manager For Enamad, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Logo Manager For Enamad plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'title' attribute of the `vc_enamad_namad`, `vc_enamad_shamed`, and `vc_enamad_custom` shortcodes in all versions up to, and including, 0.7.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6400 | 2 Helpstring, Wordpress | 2 Child Height Predictor By Ostheimer, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Child Height Predictor by Ostheimer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.3. This is due to missing nonce verification in the options() function, which handles plugin settings updates. The form template does not include a wp_nonce_field() call, and the handler never calls check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting a malicious page that submits a forged POST request, causing unauthorized changes to the plugin settings such as unit preferences to be persisted to the database via update_option(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-6405 | 2 Simonholliday, Wordpress | 2 Anomify Ai – Anomaly Detection And Alerting, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Anomify AI – Anomaly Detection and Alerting plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in versions up to and including 0.3.6. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings page handler and insufficient output escaping in the admin_options.php template. The settings form includes no wp_nonce_field() and the handler performs no check_admin_referer() check, meaning any cross-origin POST can modify plugin settings. The API key field is sanitized only with sanitize_text_field(), which strips HTML tags but does not encode double-quote characters; the value is then rendered into an HTML attribute via bare echo without esc_attr(), allowing a double-quote attribute-escape payload to survive both sanitization and storage. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts by tricking a logged-in administrator into visiting a malicious page that submits a forged request, storing the payload in the database and causing it to execute in the administrator's browser whenever the plugin settings page is visited. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7637 | 2 Pixelyoursite, Wordpress | 2 Boost, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Boost plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in versions up to, and including, 2.0.3 via deserialization of untrusted input in the STYXKEY-BOOST_USER_LOCATION cookie. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5200 | 2 Acyba, Wordpress | 2 Acymailing – An Ultimate Newsletter Plugin And Marketing Automation Solution For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-05-20 | 8.8 High |
| The AcyMailing – An Ultimate Newsletter Plugin and Marketing Automation Solution for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in versions up to, and including, 10.8.2. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to modify privileged AcyMailing configuration, export subscriber secret keys, and chain these actions into administrator account takeover when a target administrator email address is known. | ||||