Export limit exceeded: 352777 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (352777 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-35616 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientems | 2026-05-22 | 9.1 Critical |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.5 through 7.4.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6973 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Endpoint Manager Mobile | 2026-05-22 | 7.2 High |
| An Improper Input Validation in Ivanti EPMM before versions 12.6.1.1, 12.7.0.1, and 12.8.0.1 allows a remotely authenticated user with administrative access to achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8672 | 1 Syslink Software Ag | 1 Avantra | 2026-05-22 | 5.1 Medium |
| Use of default password vulnerability in syslink software AG Avantra on Linux, Windows allows Try Common or Default Usernames and Passwords. This issue affects Avantra: before 25.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71210 | 1 Trendmicro | 3 Apex One, Apexone Op, Apexone Saas | 2026-05-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One management console could allow a remote attacker to upload malicious code and execute commands on affected installations. Please note: although this vulnerability carries a technical critical CVSS rating, this was reported via responsible disclosure via a researcher through the Zero Day Initiative. The SaaS versions of the product have already been mitigated and no customer action required. For this particular vulnerability, an attacker must have access to the Trend Micro Apex One Management Console, so customers that have their console�s IP address exposed externally should consider mitigating factors such as source restrictions if not already applied. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8673 | 1 Syslink Software Ag | 1 Avantra | 2026-05-22 | 5.9 Medium |
| Unprotected transport of credentials vulnerability in syslink software AG Avantra on Linux, Windows allows Sniffing Attacks. This issue affects Avantra: before 25.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71211 | 1 Trendmicro | 3 Apex One, Apexone Op, Apexone Saas | 2026-05-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One management console could allow a remote attacker to upload malicious code and execute commands on affected installations. This vulnerability is similar in scope to CVE-2025-71210 but affects a different executable. Please note: although this vulnerability carries a technical critical CVSS rating, this was reported via responsible disclosure via a researcher through the Zero Day Initiative. The SaaS versions of the product have already been mitigated and no customer action required. For this particular vulnerability, an attacker must have access to the Trend Micro Apex One Management Console, so customers that have their console�s IP address exposed externally should consider mitigating factors such as source restrictions if not already applied. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28809 | 4 Arekinath, Dropbox, Handnot2 and 1 more | 4 Esaml, Esaml, Esaml and 1 more | 2026-05-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in esaml (and its forks) allows an attacker to cause the system to read local files and incorporate their contents into processed SAML documents, and potentially perform SSRF via crafted SAML messages. esaml parses attacker-controlled SAML messages using xmerl_scan:string/2 before signature verification without disabling XML entity expansion. On Erlang/OTP versions before 27, Xmerl allows entities by default, enabling pre-signature XXE attacks. An attacker can cause the host to read local files (e.g., Kubernetes-mounted secrets) into the SAML document. If the attacker is not a trusted SAML SP, signature verification will fail and the document is discarded, but file contents may still be exposed through logs or error messages. This issue affects all versions of esaml, including forks by arekinath, handnot2, and dropbox. Users running on Erlang/OTP 27 or later are not affected due to Xmerl defaulting to entities disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71212 | 1 Trendmicro | 3 Apex One, Apexone Op, Apexone Saas | 2026-05-22 | 7.8 High |
| A link following vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One scan engine could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71213 | 1 Trendmicro | 3 Apex One, Apexone Op, Apexone Saas | 2026-05-22 | 7.8 High |
| An origin validation error vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8670 | 1 Syslink Software Ag | 1 Avantra | 2026-05-22 | 9.6 Critical |
| Insufficient session expiration vulnerability in syslink software AG Avantra on Linux, Windows allows Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay). This issue affects Avantra: before 25.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8671 | 1 Syslink Software Ag | 1 Avantra | 2026-05-22 | 7.5 High |
| Insertion of sensitive information into log file vulnerability in syslink software AG Avantra on Linux, Windows allows Resource Leak Exposure. This issue affects Avantra: before 25.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51092 | 1 Librenms | 1 Librenms | 2026-05-22 | 9.1 Critical |
| LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutController.php's index(), SettingsController.php's update(), and PollDevice.php's initRrdDirectory(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-43073 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86-64: rename misleadingly named '__copy_user_nocache()' function This function was a masterclass in bad naming, for various historical reasons. It claimed to be a non-cached user copy. It is literally _neither_ of those things. It's a specialty memory copy routine that uses non-temporal stores for the destination (but not the source), and that does exception handling for both source and destination accesses. Also note that while it works for unaligned targets, any unaligned parts (whether at beginning or end) will not use non-temporal stores, since only words and quadwords can be non-temporal on x86. The exception handling means that it _can_ be used for user space accesses, but not on its own - it needs all the normal "start user space access" logic around it. But typically the user space access would be the source, not the non-temporal destination. That was the original intention of this, where the destination was some fragile persistent memory target that needed non-temporal stores in order to catch machine check exceptions synchronously and deal with them gracefully. Thus that non-descriptive name: one use case was to copy from user space into a non-cached kernel buffer. However, the existing users are a mix of that intended use-case, and a couple of random drivers that just did this as a performance tweak. Some of those random drivers then actively misused the user copying version (with STAC/CLAC and all) to do kernel copies without ever even caring about the exception handling, _just_ for the non-temporal destination. Rename it as a first small step to actually make it halfway sane, and change the prototype to be more normal: it doesn't take a user pointer unless the caller has done the proper conversion, and the argument size is the full size_t (it still won't actually copy more than 4GB in one go, but there's also no reason to silently truncate the size argument in the caller). Finally, use this now sanely named function in the NTB code, which mis-used a user copy version (with STAC/CLAC and all) of this interface despite it not actually being a user copy at all. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38250 | 1 Microsoft | 26 365 Copilot, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel and 23 more | 2026-05-22 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-26687 | 1 Microsoft | 26 365 Copilot, Office, Windows 10 1507 and 23 more | 2026-05-22 | 7.5 High |
| Use after free in Windows Win32K - GRFX allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30386 | 1 Microsoft | 10 365 Apps, 365 Copilot, Office and 7 more | 2026-05-22 | 8.4 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53732 | 1 Microsoft | 2 365 Copilot, Office | 2026-05-22 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53799 | 1 Microsoft | 26 365 Copilot, Office, Windows 10 1507 and 23 more | 2026-05-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| Use of uninitialized resource in Windows Imaging Component allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59234 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365, 365 Apps, 365 Copilot and 8 more | 2026-05-22 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60724 | 1 Microsoft | 32 365 Copilot, Graphics Component, Office and 29 more | 2026-05-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Graphics Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||